> On Aug 30, 2017, at 2:15 AM, Konstantin Tokarev <annu...@yandex.ru> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 30.08.2017, 03:01, "Michael Catanzaro" <mcatanz...@igalia.com>:
>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Alicia Boya García <ab...@igalia.com>
>> wrote:
>>>  As long as the sets are generated consistently that approach should be
>>>  equally fine and indeed it would reduce the burden for contributors.
>>>  You
>>>  may need at least a file to write exceptions (files not to be included
>>>  in any bundle) though.
>>> 
>>>  -- Alicia.
>> 
>> I agree, with the style checker to check for naming conflicts within
>> the same directory, and with some help from EWS, automatic generation
>> of bundles should work out fine.
> 
> Note that EWS and webkit-patch run check-webkit-style over *diff* only,
> so it won't be possible to detect such naming conflcts outside of patch
> boundaries with check-webkit-style
> 
> 

To be fully effective, we'd have to have a checker script that looks at the 
source tree too, at least files in the same directory as any touched by the 
patch.

 - Maciej

> 
>> 
>> I'm glad we've discarded the original namespace proposal.
>> 
>> Michael
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> webkit-dev mailing list
>> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
>> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Konstantin
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-dev mailing list
> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev

_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev

Reply via email to