I’m interpreting the lack of objection to mean there is no reason not to proceed with https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197131 once I get everything working nicely.
> On Apr 19, 2019, at 3:16 PM, Alex Christensen <achristen...@apple.com> wrote: > > It’s always fun to reply to two year old emails. > > I would like to have a plan to start using and requiring C++17 in WebKit. > Based on my minimal research, I believe that DebianBuster is frozen but not > yet released. Is there something we are still waiting for, or could we begin > making the switch? > >> On Aug 4, 2017, at 4:00 PM, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@igalia.com> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Yusuke SUZUKI <utatane....@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Possibly, mcatanzaro and clopez know much about WebKitGTK+ compiler >>> dependencies. >> >> As a result of the C++14 discussion on this list a few months ago, we >> relaxed our dependencies policy [1] to allow upgrading to GCC 5 one year >> earlier than planned, to the displeasure of some of our distributors who now >> have to build a custom compiler as part of their WebKit builds. We would >> prefer not to relax the policy further. >> >> Our current schedule looks like: >> >> * GCC 6 could be required in April 2018 (next Ubuntu LTS release) >> * GCC 7 (required for C++17) could be required likely late in 2019 (next >> Debian stable release) >> >> Is that acceptable for Apple? >> >> Michael >> >> [1] https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/WebKitGTK/DependenciesPolicy >> >> _______________________________________________ >> webkit-dev mailing list >> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org >> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
