On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 9:38 AM Konstantin Tokarev <annu...@yandex.ru> wrote:
> > 10.10.2019, 23:10, "Ryosuke Niwa" <rn...@webkit.org>: > > People often associate the term "WebKit" with Apple's WebKit port in > practice. The risk here is really about people not understanding the nuance > of port specific bugs & set of features. > > However, Safari has its own column in the table, and its logo is very > different. I don't think that addresses my primary concern. It's very important to signal to the rest of the world that a single port of WebKit doesn't represent the entirety of the WebKit project for the purpose of WPT pass rate or any other standards compliance. We already had a discussion about how how Apple should provide JSC binary on Linux despite of the fact Apple does not maintain any port on Linux: https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2017-December/029805.html I don't think we want to add more confusion to the situation by different ports of WebKit using the WebKit logo on wpt.fyi or any other place for that matter. - R. Niwa
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
