I've been using the short form in the layout code for a while now and never mistaken it for code block start & end. That being said I don't have strong preference on this.
Alan. On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:37 PM Ryosuke Niwa <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 11:53 AM Michael Catanzaro <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 11:19 am, Ryosuke Niwa <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Namely, some people write a lambda as: >> > auto x = [] () { } >> > >> > with a space between [] and () while others would write it as: >> > >> > auto x = []() { } >> >> 🔧: I omit the () when there are no parameters, as in these examples. >> > > I guess that's another thing we should decide. Should we, or should we not > have () when there are no arguments. > > I think we usually err on the side of more concise form but I do prefer > having () so that it's clear it's a function. Otherwise, it can look like a > code block start & end. > > - R. Niwa > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev >
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
