On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 6:13 AM Darin Adler <da...@apple.com> wrote: > I think of it as following the same naming pattern as downcast<> or > static_cast<>, but you don’t have to specify a template argument since it > infers it for you. >
I guess the closer analogy might be with const_cast, which does the "right thing" based on the type. I still think a single name conversion is less clear since we don't typically call out which type of an object is returned by a function (since we don't really use Hungarian notation). We'd end up having to look up the function declaration / definition to see whether it returns CF vs NS/UI. - R. Niwa
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
