I don’t think I can notice these patterns. I would be able to program this way
if I had an analysis tool, but otherwise this simply seems too complicated. I
can’t see the types of intermediate values to know if they are CheckedPtr or
RefPtr or raw pointers or whatever. A variation on the first line in
Element::clientLeft is a good example:
document()->updateLayoutIgnorePendingStylesheets();
That looks perfectly good to me, nothing makes me think “the result of document
is an unsafe reference to a heap-allocated object and only trivial functions
can be called on that”; I should not need to be an expert on each function to
be able to tell if code is correct or not. How can we choose a programming
style where something simple like that is subtly wrong and dangerous and
requires reviewers to look out for it?
I understand that if properly supported by a tool we could adapt to this and
write code a whole new way. Moving to this style without a tool would almost
literally require me to stop working on WebKit because I couldn’t correctly
write or review even a short function.
— Darin
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
