On Jul 7, 2006, at 5:51 AM, Joost 'AlthA' de Valk wrote:
Hi all,
there seems to be some discussion going on what to do with bugs
when they have crash reports with them, which show enabled
extensions. My view on this is VERY simple: I close each and every
such bug as INVALID. We have neither the time or the resources to
do anything else, and i'd like to keep confirming bugs as easy as
possible. Now I know I have no "official" right to decide on this,
but I hope you will all agree with me and do the same.
That seems fine to me, you could also tell the bug reporter in such
cases that they can reopen the bug if they provide a crash trace with
extensions disabled.
There's been some hard work the last few days to get the
UNCONFIRMED list under 100 again, we have succeeded in that, and
have 67 unconfirmed bugs at this moment. I want to thank everybody
who's been doing that work, it's the first step in getting our bug
reporters to feel that their bugs are being looked at and taken
care of, which is very important IMHO.
I appreciate that too. Thanks to Joost and everyone else who has been
screening unconfirmed bugs in bugzilla.
Regards,
Maciej
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.opendarwin.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
