Hello, does this segfault stack look familiar? #0 0x00007ffff0da6012 in JSC::Register::jsValue (this=0x7fff9cbd2ff8) at ../../Source/JavaScriptCore/interpreter/Register.h:118 #1 0x00007ffff0f77d79 in JSC::DFG::prepareOSREntry (exec=0x7fff9cbd3248, codeBlock=Reading in symbols for ../../Source/JavaScriptCore/bytecode/CodeBlock.cpp...done. 0xd87c00, bytecodeIndex=0x0) at ../../Source/JavaScriptCore/dfg/DFGOSREntry.cpp:169 #2 0x00007ffff10adb1e in JSC::operationOptimize (exec=0x7fff9cbd3248, bytecodeIndex=0x0) at ../../Source/JavaScriptCore/jit/JITOperations.cpp:1157 #3 0x00007fffa87ad871 in ?? () #4 0x00007fffa868c920 in ?? () #5 0x000000000058d890 in ?? () #6 0x000000000219ad30 in ?? () #7 0x00000000014c56a0 in ?? () #8 0x0000000000441e80 in ?? () #9 0x00007ffff21419e0 in thread_context_stack () from /opt/SafeViewInstall/SafelyWebKit/be6295ae37fe29466287f0b7577ddb929c6cccb0/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0 #10 0x00007fffffffd1a0 in ?? () #11 0x00007ffff1099f50 in JSC::JITCode::execute (this=0x7fff7acc3730, vm=0x7fff7acc3730, protoCallFrame=Reading in symbols for ../../Source/JavaScriptCore/interpreter/Interpreter.cpp...done.
I’m wondering if the jsCStack code wasn’t fully baked when it went into 2.4. Thanks as always for your help. Gary Kratkin
_______________________________________________ webkit-gtk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-gtk
