> > > Is it absolutely necessary that if I need to build WebKit for ARM, I need > to do it with one of its ports? In that case, which would be the suitable > port providing only the parsing/rendering part? >
Once again. Webkit is not a BROWSER ! So there is no rendering that can happen without a toolkit (atleast today) ! So without making a port decision you cannot compile webkit ! Now the choice of the port depends on what kind of display hardware/driver support you have. First question are you running linux or WinCE on your target? Do you have linux framebuffer / DirectFB / X11 running ? Once you find answers for these questions, then you have to choose between QT and GTK based on your comfort level. There are full featured browsers that are built out of both these ports (look at epiphany and arora ) > -Pritam. > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Ariya Hidayat > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> You also might want to read first what I've written here: >> >> http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/webkit-help/2009-August/000146.html >> >> >> Like Holger wrote in his answer, modifying (and refactoring) one of >> the ports to suit your need is likely a better solution than creating >> a new port from scratch. >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Ariya Hidayat >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/ariyahidayat >> > > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-help mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-help > > -- Sriram Neelakandan Author - Embedded Linux System Design And Development ( http://tinyurl.com/2doosu)
_______________________________________________ webkit-help mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-help
