>Do any other browsers do this? If not, this seems like a potential compatibility issue.
Yes. Some of the browsers like ANT & Netfront supports plugin loading.with display:none. >If you want to hide plugins visually bug still have them run I'd suggest using visibility:hidden instead of >display:none. Actually I'm not a web developer. Some web applications are authored to load plugins with "display:none" to act as a audio player by implementing it's GUI using HTML/JS/CSS. -Vicky On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Adam Roben <[email protected]> wrote: > On Oct 12, 2011, at 3:06 AM, Vicky Tux wrote: > > > Acutally I'm not a Web Developer. We are using webkit as part of our > middle-ware. Some of the web applications authored to hide the plugin from > layout as like below, > > > > <div style="display: none;" > > > <object type="application/x-plugin1" id="plugin1"></object> > > <object type="application/x-plugin2" id="plugin2"></object> > > </div> > > > > Also those plugins are scripted from Java Script. In the above case > webkit is doesn't initialize plugins if it's(or parent's) style is display : > none. > > > > Currently webkit's plugin initialization is based on RenderTree not > DOMTree. To fix this issue I thinking to implement a RenderNone class(as > like RenderBlock,RenderInline,..etc) which paints nothing but just acts as a > container for child elements. > > > > But i don't have any idea of RenderTree. Currently implementing > RenderNone based on RenderBlock & RenderInline. > > > > Will it work..? any suggestions..? > > Do any other browsers do this? If not, this seems like a potential > compatibility issue. > > If you want to hide plugins visually bug still have them run I'd suggest > using visibility:hidden instead of display:none. > > -Adam > > >
_______________________________________________ webkit-help mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-help
