On Thursday 11 March 2010 14:09:31 Simon Hausmann wrote: > > Any other opinions out there? :) > > > If we go that route, then I'd still like to provide source tarballs of the > 2.0 release of course, for those who are using Qt 4.6. The source tar ball > can be compiled and installed against 4.6.
To be the bad guy here...the decision is really up to the stakeholders at Nokia right now as they/you do the majority of work anyway. What is the difference between having a QtWebKit 2.0 and not having it at all? >From an outside point of view it looks like we make a tarball from the release branch with the 4.7 tag available? Is that everything? If we don't have an independent release process today, when will we? holger _______________________________________________ webkit-qt mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
