On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Benjamin Poulain <[email protected]> wrote: > On 03/01/2011 08:50 PM, ext Alexis Menard wrote: >>> >>> class QWebNode { >>> enum Type { Element, Text }; >>> Type type() const; >>> QWebElement parent() const; >>> QWebElement document() const; >>> QWebNode nextSibling() const; >> >> I think changing the return type is not BIC. MSVC mangling put the name of >> the >> return type if I recall correctly. > > You are right. MSVC is an issue, and the constructor being called is > another. > > I think that is fine in this case though, since I am not modifying any > symbol, I am adding one. > > cheers, > Benjamin >
While digging online I found this : http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Binary_Compatibility_Examples which confirm my MSVC assumption :). -- Alexis Menard Software Engineer INdT Recife Brazil _______________________________________________ webkit-qt mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
