On 06/01/2011 09:46 AM, ext Zoltan Horvath wrote:
Currently, we are running qtwebkit-tests on our bots, but does it make
sense to run these?
Now, 203 are passed, 6 are failed, 2 are skipped. Is this acceptable?
It keeps our bot always orange. I don't think that it is a good message
that we have API regressions.
It would be really nice if someone from Nokia side could make time to
take care API-tests (if these are important of course).
Any thoughts and/or volunteers?
They are important.
The problem is we are currently understaffed due to an internal Nokia
project taking lots of engineers.
I suggest to add "expected failure" exceptions for the failing tests.
And create a P1 tasks for each one.
Failing API tests are particularly dangerous for releases. It is one of
the focus of QtWebKit 2.2. Anyone is welcome to help on this problem.
cheers,
Benjamin
_______________________________________________
webkit-qt mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
