On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 3:56 AM, Osztrogonac Csaba <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi,
Hi Ossy. > > I think this announcement wasn't so lucky. :( > > Let's see the release criterias: > http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/QtWebKitRelease22 > "Betas: We have buildbots running on all Tier 1 platforms and they're > green;" > > I think green isn't enough for relase, because failing API tests don't make > the bot red. > As far as I remember somebody said that all API tests must pass on all Tier > 1 platforms. > But unfortunately I see many failing API tests: We had plenty of discussions on the QCS and Nokia regarding the API tests (sorry for not discussing it here on the list) and the fact that we have several failures. These are not trivial to fix, some have always failed and some, in order to be fixed, will introduce a change in the API behavior... :-( It's a bit sad, but API tests failing are not blocking the release anymore (it's a nice-to-have, not a blocker bug). > > - Build on Symbian is still broken > http://build.webkit.sed.hu/builders/QtWebKit2.2-branch%20Symbian%20ARMv5%20Release/builds/30 This bot is a work-in-progress. We don't have a stable build-bot on Symbian yet. :-( But we do have manual builds and some tests running on Symbian. So yes, we're making a compromise with this beta release. We know it's not perfect, but we consider it (far) better than QtWebKit-2.0 (included in Qt-4.7), quite stable and secure. If we wait for everything to be perfect, we'll risk having yet again a 1 year stabilization period. BR, - Ademar -- Ademar de Souza Reis Jr. <[email protected]> Nokia Institute of Technology _______________________________________________ webkit-qt mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
