On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Loïc Yhuel
<[email protected]> wrote:
> How would you wrap a QObject* (so it's signals could be invoked, properties
> accessed) ?
> Dynamically constructing wrapper functions, and sending them as JSON would
> be complex, and probably slow.

For those use-cases, we will probably need web process plugins, and
communicate with it via messages. WebKit2 already supports that on mac
via InjectionBundles API.

> Le mercredi 12 octobre 2011 00:08:20, [email protected] a écrit :
>>
>> I was thinking that you can stringify/parse JSON on either side. Those
>> convenience converters are nice sugar, but can be done without.
>> ________________________________________
>> From: ext Loïc Yhuel [[email protected]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 3:05 PM
>> To: Rosenthal Noam (Nokia-CTO-Qt/SiliconValley)
>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [webkit-qt] API proposal for handling (some) hybrid use cases
>>
>> I see your examples and prototype code are always using a string as
>> message argument.
>> Is it possible to use a QVariant like with the QtWebKit bridge ?
>>
>> If I understand correctly, it won't be possible to implement synchronous
>> JS ->  C++ calls like Q_INVOKABLE methods.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-qt mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
>



-- 
Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Senior Engineer
Application and Service Frameworks, Nokia Danmark A/S
Phone  +45 4093 0598 / E-mail kenneth.christiansen at gmail.com

http://codeposts.blogspot.com ﹆﹆﹆
_______________________________________________
webkit-qt mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt

Reply via email to