On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 6:35 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think we can eliminate this boolean altogether. Why don't we always have 
> the interaction engine
> around (might be nice to get it working on desktop computers with an attached 
> touch screen)?
> It should act only on touch events.

That could be fine.

>
> One remaining point is the resizeToContents behaviour, which in turn will 
> toggle whether to show
> scrollbars or indicators (missing atm).

A preference no? I don't think here we increase the complexity like we
had in WK1.

>
> We clearly need a way to forcibly enable/disable resizeToContents, at least 
> for WTR. But ideally
> we're smart about it and we just initialize it "correctly".

That could be easily enabled/disabled through a private thing.

>
> We could play with heuristics, such as looking at the screen resolution and 
> the dpi (QGuiApplication::primaryScreen()).
> If the physical dimension of the "display" is below a certain shreshold 
> (10"?), we simply figure that
> scrollbars don't make sense and go to resizeToContents mode.

Sounds like magic to me.

>
> Anyway, I think you get what I'm getting at: Let's see if there's a way to 
> avoid a mode/boolean
> that distinguishes between "desktop" and "mobile".

Well the merge was a good step, let's figure out the two remaining issues :D.

>
> Simon
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-qt mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
>



-- 
Alexis Menard (darktears)
Software Engineer
INdT Recife Brazil
_______________________________________________
webkit-qt mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt

Reply via email to