I think it sounds reasonable, but did anyone measure performance? I mean, could libxml2 be slower than QXmlStreamReader?
Kenneth On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Simon Hausmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > While we're at the topic of third-party libraries (ICU...), there's one other > thing that I discussed with Andreas yesterday that might make sense for us > regarding XSLT support: > > I'd like to propose that we remove the code that uses QtXmlPatterns to > implement XSLT support in WebKit. Instead I'd like to make libxslt a > dependency (now that we have configure tests) for anyone who wants to build > QtWebKit with XSLT support. > > If XSLT support is enabled - and therefore libxslt available - we also get an > implicit availability of libxml. I suggest that in that case we also use > libxml for XML parsing. > > If XSLT support is _not_ enabled, we don't have libxslt and therefore also no > libxml available and should continue to use QXmlStreamReader for XML parsing. > > Does that sound reasonable? > > > Simon > _______________________________________________ > webkit-qt mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt > -- Kenneth Rohde Christiansen Senior Engineer Application and Service Frameworks, Nokia Danmark A/S Phone +45 4093 0598 / E-mail kenneth.christiansen at gmail.com http://codeposts.blogspot.com ﹆﹆﹆ _______________________________________________ webkit-qt mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
