On Wednesday 09 May 2012 16:48:28 Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > On Wednesday 09 May 2012, Simon Hausmann wrote: > > Hi, > > > > After a few emails, let me formulate a concrete proposal: > > (1) Andrea Diamantini maintains an up-to-date port of WebKit that runs > > > > with Qt 4, on gitorious.org. > > > > (2) End of May we remove Qt 4 code paths from WebKit trunk. > > I don't know. Wouldn't that make it much harder to maintain the other port? > If we do this, we should make sure that it will not result in merge > conflicts, otherwise we are just making the Qt4 port unmaintainable. > > Best regards. > `Allan >
Yes, some doubt. How can the Qt4 unofficial port continue to be synced with WebKit trunk if you remove it? Regards, -- Andrea Diamantini, adjam GPG Fingerprint: 57DE 8E32 7D1A 0E16 AA52 59D8 84F9 3ECD DBF9 730F rekonq project WEB: http://rekonq.kde.org IRC: rekonq@freenode _______________________________________________ webkit-qt mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
