El mar, 05-02-2013 a las 11:00 +0100, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen escribió: > Why use enchant and not just use Hunspell (like Firefox, Chrome, > Opera, Mac, Openoffice). That also allows for using the Chrome version > which uses binary dicts and provides faster start up time and lookups.
Point of using enchant is that it is pluggable, and allows to add other text checkers. This is a requirement here, as we'd be using an internal spellchecker. In the scenario of enchant, the solution would be adding a new backend for Chrome version of Hunspell, or make enchant Hunspell backend use the Google Chrome Hunspell. _______________________________________________ webkit-qt mailing list [email protected] https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-qt
