On Tuesday 12 March 2013 10:44:26 Simon Hausmann wrote: > On Wednesday, February 13, 2013 04:47:55 PM Alberto Mardegan wrote: > > Hi all! > > > > I plan to spend some time on building a QtQuick (Qt5) plugin for > > WebKit1. > > > > There are several reasons why I want to do this, the main ones being the > > possibility of playing with the cookie jar and having direct access to the > > DOM. > > It should also make sense for people who need just a quick web renderer > > and don't need the split-process design (for instance, for a help > > application rendering local content). > > > > I'm basically writing this e-mail FYI, and of course to collect early > > feedback (let me know if you see any sense in this effort, or whether > > you welcome it). > > I'm going to use the opportunity to give some feedback :)
<snip> > I recently learned that the KDAB folks apparently have had success with > doing simple QObject bindings across process boundaries. With reasonable > contraints that are documented (properties would be value cached, so don't > expose heavy content for example) that might be a workable alternative to > make hybrid use- cases easier. See: http://qt.gitorious.org/~milianw/qt-labs/milianws-qwebchannel/trees/master -- Milian Wolff | [email protected] | Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company Tel. Germany +49-30-521325470, Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-independent software solutions
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ webkit-qt mailing list [email protected] https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-qt
