Stephen Compall <[email protected]> writes: > Jan Rychter <[email protected]> writes: >> In particular, if you think about how the current navigation works, you >> realize that it has serious limitations -- for example, it uses dynamic >> variables > > This is a manifestation of using CUC and CUDC. Eliminating these solves > the problem, by letting you pass a closure to WALK-WIDGETS or something > instead of just plonking a hodgepodge of methods onto a GF and hoping > the others cooperate.
Yes and no. While I do agree that something like walk-widgets is needed, I feel that the right approach is a combination of a functional approach with reasonable use of CLOS. --J. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
