> On 2 Lut, 13:47, "Leslie P. Polzer" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-prevalence-devel/2008-March/00009... > > Oh, that. Thankfully, I've encountered and worked around this on my > way through cl-prevalence, > and ended up with passing object ids instead of the objects themselves > to transactions.
Nice to hear. :) I considered this solution too but found it way to cumbersome and went for the non-kludgy way. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
