"Leslie P. Polzer" <[email protected]> writes: > John Fremlin wrote: > >> I didn't understand how to make a delivered Lisp image (where the source >> directory may have moved or not be accessible) play well with the >> versioning of CSS and JS files, which tries to grovel around in the source >> directory > > Do you mean the static files directory (where the files accessible via > /pub reside)? > > >> to see if the files have been modified. This obviously won't >> work if the source directory has moved. > > If you answered yes to the above question then try using your own > copy of the static files and point Weblocks at it. > > >> Is there a way of defining where the source of CSS and JS files should >> be put which doesn't involve mucking about with ASDF (not popular >> in delivered images)? > > Use the :PUBLIC-FILES-PATH argument to DEFWEBAPP.
To be clear, I was already doing this. The patch addresses the problems which occur after doing that -- when using a delivered image weblocks still keeps trying to asdf stuff and gets upset. Am I confused? ;-) [...] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
