"Leslie P. Polzer" <[email protected]> writes:
> John Fremlin wrote:
[...]
>> Why not just depend on trivial-backtrace?
>
> On SBCL we just do better than TB and thus don't need it.
Curious to know what is better? (I am strangely enough a bit of a
trivial-backtrace proponent as I wrote my own trivial-backtrace before
finding out that Gary already had written it, and then included my code
in his version.)
> We can read-conditionalize this dep in the ASD. Can you provide
> a patch for that?
Is this it? ;-)
diff -r efc83a14156b weblocks.asd
--- a/weblocks.asd Wed Jul 15 18:01:35 2009 +0200
+++ b/weblocks.asd Fri Aug 07 17:27:07 2009 +0900
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
:description "A Common Lisp web framework."
:depends-on (:closer-mop :metatilities :hunchentoot :cl-who :cl-ppcre
:cl-json :puri :md5
:cl-fad :fare-matcher :cl-cont :parenscript :anaphora
:f-underscore
- :bordeaux-threads :salza2 :trivial-timeout)
+ :bordeaux-threads :salza2 :trivial-timeout #-sbcl
:trivial-backtrace)
:components ((:module src
:components (
(:file "package")
[...]
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"weblocks" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
