On Aug 1, 11:21 am, Mackram <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey Leslie, no problem at all. Let me know if you want some help or
> anything.
>
> Note that I am going to be kind of busy in the coming weeks so i might
> not have alot of time to work on the widget/view problem.
>
> Let me know if you need anything.
Two first observations:
1)
diff -r 5822fd897401 -r 826cbaa2b428 examples/weblocks-demo/weblocks-
demo.lisp
--- a/examples/weblocks-demo/weblocks-demo.lisp Sat Jul 04 22:00:07
2009 +0300
+++ b/examples/weblocks-demo/weblocks-demo.lisp Mon Jul 27 23:59:22
2009 +0300
@@ -24,9 +24,20 @@
"Access to a sandbox store in the session."
`(hunchentoot:session-value 'sandbox-store))
+(define-client-backend jquery :js-root "backends/jquery"
+ :js-files `("jquery"
+ "jquery-ui"
+ "dialog-jquery"
+ "weblocks-jquery"
+ "jquery-delayedObserver"
"jquery-ui-autocomplete")
+ :css-root ""
+ :css-files `("main" "layout" "dialog"
"jquery-ui"))
Weblocks should have the JQuery and Prototype backends defined out of
the box.
Also, what currently happens when we have multiple definitions for a
backend?
2) namespacing
We should structure the Weblocks API a bit. All elements should be
part
of a namespace/object named "Weblocks". Specialized APIs (e.g. Effect)
should probably have their own namespace beneath.
So blindUpEffectById() will become Weblocks.Effect.blindUpById().
Leslie
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"weblocks" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
