Nico de Jager wrote: > The following simplified code snipped works fine when ran interpreted > in LispWorks 5.1.2 Pro, but fails when the code is compiled. Compiled > code only fails when expanding to a multiple-value-call special > operator. It works fine in SBCL and CCL, but I am a LispWorks user :-) > Please help.
I don't have Lispworks except at work :-( Can you show a macroexpansion of the smallest form triggering the bug? (In and outside with-call/cc.) Then we should be able to fiddle with cl-cont so it generates a more correct transform. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
