On Feb 10, 1:22 pm, Ababo <[email protected]> wrote: > lisp/systems/ as root and this approach is not working with weblocks > which is creates files inside its own sources directory (but should > place them in some temporary one.
It's best to have one Weblocks installation per project. I agree it would be nice to have flexible temporary directories, but it's not going to happen unless somebody is annoyed enough by it to fix it. > 2) I'm writting a server which uses hunchentoot for receiving client > data via http/post (client is a software agent on smartphone). When I > start working with weblocks it kills my easy handler in hunchentoot. > Is there a possibility to bind weblocks responce only to single web- > path preserving all other http-handlers without deep diving into > weblocks internals? A simple solution is to push your handle in front of Weblocks in the dispatch table: (asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op 'weblocks) (push 'my-dispatcher hunchentoot:*dispatch-table*) Leslie -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en.
