szabolcs.szucs wrote: > What do you think about this solution? (I'm really interested, > especially regarding threads and stuff.. Actually it seems to work..) > > (defvar *object*) > > (defwidget dyna-dataform (dataform) > ()) > > (defmethod render-dataform ((obj dyna-dataform) data &rest args) > (declare (ignore args)) > (let ((*object* data)) > (call-next-method))) > > Later I use dyna-dataform instead of dataform...
Yes, exactly what I had in mind. It's not exactly pretty but works well. Anyway, now that we've discussed this I think your solution is way better. Would you like to create a fork on Bitbucket so I can pull your change? Leslie -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en.
