Slobodan, Sorry again for my lateness in responding. I'm glad you've had success using my patches. If you have a link to a site running the postmodern backend with the connection pooling patches I'd be pleased to see it. I very much regret to say it but I'm not sure when I'll have the chance to do more work on these. I can't authoritatively say they're suitable for merging but I'm glad you got some use out of them. I'd be happy for anyone else to try and pick them up and/or speed their inclusion: https://bitbucket.org/redline6561/weblocks-dev/overview
There are 6 relevant patches, starting with "Postmodern fix by Slobodan..." Cheers, B On Feb 15, 1:51 pm, Slobodan Milnović <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Brit, > > So far I don't have any issues except the > > (defmethod class-id-slot-name ((class dao-class)) > ;; Returns a list of the column names which compose the primary key. > (dao-keys class)) > > For some reason I have to put (car (dao-keys class)) because in my > case class-id-slot-name assumes that the data it gets is actually an > list of objects and not the object itself. I'll try to understand why, > because I guess that you don't have that issue. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en.
