On Thursday, November 8, 2012 3:34:32 PM UTC-5, Scott L. Burson wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Brian O'Reilly > <[email protected]<javascript:> > > wrote: > >> >> I'm willing to throw some effort into the pot. Do you think you could >> provide a TODO list for outstanding features in order of importance? >> >> > The only two things I recall offhand are: () implement the navbar option > for navigations; () convert 'checkboxes-presentation'. > > Beyond that, I think there are two ways to go at it. You could go > systematically through the Weblocks sources looking for things that still > need conversion. Or, you could just start building your own app, and > convert things as the need arises. > > There's something to be said for both of these. On the one hand, it would > be nice if we could reach a point where we could announce that > Weblocks/Bootstrap is complete (in a 1.0 sense). A systematic pass will be > needed for that. On the other hand, all that's going to accomplish is to > re-implement functionality already anticipated in Weblocks. There's a > whole bunch of new and cool stuff that could be added, and as someone who > already has jQuery and Bootstrap experience, you probably have a much > better feel than I would as to which potential new features are most > desirable. > > I would say, do whichever of these most appeals to you. > > Okay, well, let me just say that I'm a weblocks novice, and my bootstrap/jquery experience is limited to having read the bootstrap website and having come to the conclusion that the designers working on bootstrap have much better visual design sense than I do. I was fooling around with your tree yesterday, and I noticed that (wop:make-app ...) produced a standard weblocks application with prototype includes. Do you have to make manual changes to the defwebapp form to override the defaults? I realise that by going the way of bootstrap/jquery I now have two moving pieces in my stack which obviously makes it a little more challenging... but I've been treating html as a textual presentation format since 1995, and have no personal opinnion of the graphical quality of the webified common lisp hyperspec, so it's probably a pill I should swallow. :)
-B -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/weblocks/-/dEZrT7AH7M8J. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en.
