Thank you, patch applied, compatibility with latest asdf (2.26.152) is fixed. As for other questions I don't know yet.
понедельник, 31 декабря 2012 г., 0:31:55 UTC+2 пользователь [email protected] написал: > > Dear weblocks hackers, > > recent failures of ASDF 2.26.36 to compile weblocks led me to give a look > at your .asd files. > > In the end, I improved backwards compatibility, and I believe that the > latest ASDF (currenty 2.26.45) will compile weblocks. Please test, though. > > However, while I was at it, I made those small improvements to your .asd > files. > > Also, I don't quite understand what is the intent of the > prepare-prevalence-op thingie. How is it not but a horribly inefficient way > to do the same as including :weblocks-memory in your :depends-on? > > I would also cut on all the defpackage overhead when all you're doing is > using a single defsystem form. ASDF will load your systems in a package > where defsystem already works, for lambda's sake! > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
