There is make-app function. It seems make-app-op is related to make-app and if you see make-app code all seems to be ok. How about moving doc-op into weblocks-test.asd ? There are make-app calls here https://github.com/html/weblocks-app-generation-scripts So code is used but it does not really matter where will it be.
вторник, 21 марта 2017 г., 4:49:55 UTC+2 пользователь François-René Rideau написал: > > weblocks.asd defines a wop::test-op which is actually the same symbol as > asdf::test-op, so the class gets redefined. Unhappily, it also does it > wrong, and fails to inherit from selfward-operation. Similarly, doc-op > should inherit from non-propagating-operation (or maybe selfward-operation). > > doc-op if useful should probably be moved to a separate system with its > own asd file, that weblocks.asd :defsystem-depends-on. > > Is make-app-op a thing? It appears once, but looks like it doesn't exist. > > If you move all the cruft to other libraries, you can just get rid of that > wop package. > > -#f > Slogans rarely convince the unconvinced. However, they do rally the troops > already on your side. — John McCarthy > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/weblocks. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
