This is the only comparison I've seen on the subject, posted by Georg
Tuparev:
http://lists.apple.com/archives/webobjects-dev/2005/Dec/msg00247.html
And I've heard from other sources who did extensive PG (but not FB)
evaluation, that there is a significant improvement between legacy PG
7.x and newer 8.* versions... So I guess both PG and FB are good
choices now :-)
Andrus
On May 3, 2006, at 7:31 PM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
Hi!
From what I can see, it certainly has one advantage: clustering
support. Nice!
Yours
Miguel Arroz
On 2006/05/04, at 00:25, Pierce T. Wetter III wrote:
On May 3, 2006, at 3:50 PM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
Hi!
Yes, but I did ask about PostgreSQL! :) I know that almost
everything out there is better than MySQL. What I was asking for
was a comparison between PgSQL and FrontBase, to know if the
FrontBase advantages are good enough to make me thing about using
FrontBase instead of PgSQL.
The problem with that is I don't know anything about PgSQL. 6
years ago when I was picking databases, it was kind of feeble, and
not supported very well on OSX.
Don't know where its at now.
I do know that FB works extremely well with WO, which is why I
posted that info here.
:-)
Pierce
"The world lies in the hands of evil
And we pray it would last" -- Apocalyptica, Life Burns!
Miguel Arroz
http://www.ipragma.com
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [email protected]
