Hi there,

On 02/06/2006, at 6:00 AM, Pierce T. Wetter III wrote:

On Jun 1, 2006, at 2:35 AM, Adam Czysciak wrote:

What is your experience guys? Is setting the default fetch timestamp lag recommended? If so, what value do you recommend? (I know, this is really app specific...)

I've never had good luck with the object timestamp thing. What ends up happening is any object you cached gets arbitrarily refetched when you least expect it.

Well the 'object timestamp thing' is always a factor. It's not an either/or choice. It's just a matter of time ;-) before the tsl (timestamp lag which defaults to 1 hour) kicks into play...

Instead, what we do is all of our servers run something called spread. (http://www.spread.org) That basically gives us a robust broadcast messaging system so that we can publish messages to all the servers.

We then use a category on EOEditingContext

<wish>Bring back WO-Objective-C ;-)</wish>

to add a method called "saveChangesAndNotify". We use this method anytime we want to broadcast that an object has changed. This calls processRecentChanges to get a list of the changed objects, then broadcasts the GIDs on the invalidate channel. Processes that care connect to the invalidate channel on their local spread daemon and invalidate the GID (which invalidates it in all the local ecs. )

It's simple, it works, and its not very application specific because you can selectively choose where to call saveChanges() and where to call saveChangesAndNotify(). You can even make sure that the parent relationships get refetched by adding the GID of the parent to the broadcast as needed; something the fetch timestamp may not do.

Interesting framework. Thanks for pointing it out...

with regards,
--

Lachlan Deck


_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to archive@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to