Hello,
I think "tone" is something that it is permissible to upgrade :-).
Maybe the negative sounding statement(s) can be moved out of the introduction block to the proposed new "Disadvantages" section ? The WO Wikibook introduction sounds more neutral to me in comparison: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Programming:WebObjects
A fair (ie not just WO propoganda) comaprision with Rails could usefully be attached to the "OSS Alternatives" section.
I found one comparison in the WebObjects WikiBook. I just added some links to the WOCOM Wiki with pros and cons to be - hopefully - fair there also: WO to Ruby on Rails (2005, Deirdre Saoirse Moen, Rails side) http://deirdre.net/posts/2005/08/webobjects-to-ruby-on-rails/ and http://deirdre.net/wp-content/extra_content/wo-to-rails.pdf WO vs Ruby on Rails (2006, Jonathan Rentzsch, WO side) Does anyone have these slides ? Related: http://desperatepundit.com/blog/cremes/technology/2006/02/15/WebObjects-versus-Ruby-On-Rails.html?page=comments WebObjects "Myths" vs Ruby on Rails http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Programming:WebObjects/Alternative_Technologies/Ruby_on_Rails ( Location: http://www.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WOCOM/WOCOM+Marketing ) Marc _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
