The MySQL clustering seems promising.... you need probably a minimum
of a half-dozen or more computers for it to be effective. Seemingly,
you may get a few transaction rollbacks if a node dies, but hey, we
have the ERXTolerantSaver, right?
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/mysql-cluster-overview.html
On Apr 16, 2007, at 10:10 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
(Ps, We're currently deployed with mysql, so any change to
something like FrantBase ... I'd need to be able to convince some
people here... so feel free to mention any other benefits/
comparisons in this thread also ;-)
MySQL supports clustering built-in in 5.0. We were going to do
some load testing on this, but ended up just going with FrontBase
for right now, so we didn't end running these tests yet. I don't
know MySQL's commit semantics for clustering. The only thing I
have read about them is that for clustering, the entire database
needs to be in memory. So if you have an enormous database, this
might be a problem. For most people, memory is pretty cheap and
this probably isn't THAT big of a deal.
ms
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
