On 21/06/2007, at 5:43 AM, Peter Pritchard wrote:
I'm not the direct action king, but ...
it seems kinda scary to try to access "request()" in your
constructor ...
when you have a perfectly good aRequest object that you just got
passed in ...
While it's true that there is an aRequest object provided and I
could've used that - I'd be more worried if request() was not
available after having called super. i.e., after calling super you
have access to the same data as any other instance method.
with regards,
--
Lachlan Deck
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
