Picture 2.png
Description: application/applefile
<<inline: Picture 2.png>>
? On Jul 6, 2007, at 5:07 PM, Louis Demers wrote:
On 6-Jul-07, at 16:33 , Andrew Lindesay wrote:Hello Janine;The only feature of WOBuilder that I consider important is the one that helps you to visualize what your component will look like when it's rendered. WOBuilder always did a lousy job of this, especiallyIt's interesting; we all have quite different ways of working with components which probably illustrates different ways of thinking. I really do like Mike's component editor, but to augment it, I would also enjoy the visual modeller in WOB. I really do not feel at all like I need a full render of the page with data or anything -- what WOB does is perfect for my use. It's really a logical view for making bindings. I'd love to have the time for such an undertaking. :-/You expressed exactly what I was trying to say. Indeed, I believe that the graphical presentation must not aim at the aesthetics of the page/component but rather it's structure along with a decent inspector for the available bindings. The aesthetics of the presentation should be done through CSS and could be handed off to other tools like CSSEdit and the like.In a sense, couldn't it be structured like the eomodeler in eclipse ? A tree showing the structure and some inspector specific to the webobject tags being edited ?_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/mschrag% 40mdimension.comThis email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
