Hi,
I like working with WebObjects, am just worrying about the market
which is not identifying its value and going with all different
technologies like: Hibernate, Spring, JSF, Flex, Tapestry,...
Thanks & Rgds,
Shravan Kumar.M
"Let us learn from the past to profit by the present,and from the
present to live better in the future."
--William WordsWorth
---------------------------------------------------------------
On 21-Dec-07, at 1:40 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 21 December 2007 1:19:12 AM GMT+05:30
To: WebObjects Dev <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: JSF
Yeah... JSF is a mess. So is the underlying JSP. Tapestry can't
keep compatibility with itself for more than a year in a row, and
hence can't be used for enterprise applications that have a much
longer maintenance lifespan. And now with web development going all
JavaScript, the talent pool for potential open source WO
challengers is quickly draining. So WO is doing quite well by
comparison and might just keep claiming the best HTML component
framework position for years to come. Go figure :-)
Andrus
On Dec 20, 2007, at 8:29 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
http://www.jsftutorials.net/components/pic/relationship.jpg
I think this sums up JSF quite nicely :)
ms
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
