Is MySQL the only db that has to use eo_pk_table?
Huh? how is selecting from a sequence different?
My assumption being that if you're using a db without auto_increment
columns, then everyone using the DB is using the sequence for pk
generation, so it's properly incrementing all the time ... I suppose
it's possible someone on PG might be using a DIFFERENT sequence than
the one that EOF is using by default, but you could add an attribute
userInfo entry to specify the name of the sequence to use as an easy
workaround for that. I suppose an app could be using PG and doing
their own "eo_pk_table" entirely, too. Maybe I'm just putting too much
faith in the "if you have a 'right' way to do it, you should use it"
of humanity.
ms
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
