used to denote non-litteral expressions in ognl bindings (e.g
use the WO 5.4.x "[...] " marker)? And if it is, how to do it?
Not currently, though it may be coming. I still say $xxx is a better
syntax than [xxx].
It may be better but I don't like special prefix characters à la
perl (just a personal taste). Though truth be told "$" being
(almost) the only special character makes it bearable). Also being a
ObjC programmer I already have the [xxx] in my finger memory (and I
do like that syntax in ObjC contrary to some).
I really dig WOOGNL but the syntax is pretty ugly :-)
My bullet points on the subject :)
* [xxx] guarantees you an extra character to type on every binding --
completion can never fill it in for you because it never knows when
you're done
* even Apple doesn't use [xxx] syntax for cocoa bindings OR ObjC 2.0
properties (which were designed to look like bindings), though
admittedly they don't use $ either, but they EXPLICITLY did not use
[xxx] markup
* $xxx is the standard inline markup of just about every template
language, which, for one, also makes it consistent with the velocity
templates that we use other places inside of WOLips
ms
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
