I'm not sure I'd call it a "bug" as Chuck's original code does the
Right Thing® in 99.9% of the situations you'd use it. But, being the
PITA that I am, I've come up with a situation where even though the
his code can't verify that what I'm doing is safe from a referential-
integrity perspective, I know it will be safe due to my specific
business-logic rules.
So, if by saying he gave me a patch for the bug, he means he told me
which safety to disable, I guess that would be about right. :-)
Dave
On Apr 6, 2008, at 8:26 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
David Avendasora pointed out a bug in it if you are using self-
referential relationships (entity with a relationship to itself). I
gave him a patch, but I really need to rethink some parts of that
code. It works for most things, but I think there are some more
buggy cases. It also does not (yet) order operations on the same
table which self-referential relationships really need.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
