Florijan (who does the jbnd framework for JavaClient) doesn't seem to like EOAssociation. What are the pros and cons of using them?
John On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 7:12 AM, Ricardo Legorreta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Message: 5 > Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 22:06:50 +0200 > From: Stephane Guyot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: The "Mobile me" web apps > To: WebObjects Development <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed > > Use JC and maybe JC components (from DTC ): > > We have been working with JavaClient for several months with the following > approach: > > - Develop an EOF, displaygroup and EOAssociation bindings with > JFormDesigner and of course swing. > - Include many SwingX component from SwingLabs project, and other cool > swing components with animation. > > We have developed in Flex 2.0 and of course in Cocoa, WO 4.5, NeXTStep... > Flex is good but also I strongly recommend you to > try JavaClient with the EOAssociation bindings and use all the nice > JavaSwing technology that is out here. > > Ricardo. > > -------------------------- > > > > Ricardo, > > interesting :-) > > Can someone speak about "the wonderful Ajax frameworks shown at > WOWODC " or it is under NDA ? > Does Apple have something in the pipe for the RIA, RDA applications ? > Cocoa Integrated Runtime ? Cocoa-leigth js implementation ? OpenStep > like resurrection ? > Adobe is using WebKit for AIR : http://www.adobe.com/devnet/air/flex/ > > Any informations are wellcome, if not under NDA. > > Stephane > > > Le 11 juin 08 à 20:56, Ricardo Parada a écrit : > > > > Ok, most of us have probably seen the mobile me web apps. They are > > web 2.0 apps that use javascript and ajax. There's a lot of good > > stuff in those apps. So much good stuff there. I wished Apple > > made some of that stuff available to us (developers) in some > > form. :-) > > > I'm guessing that the back end for those apps is using WebObjects. > > I can see that in the current webmail app for .mac and I assume > > that's also going to be the case for the mobile me web apps. And > > we should probably point people to all these great applications > > when they have doubts about WebObjects. > > > Anyways, I'm just so curious if Apple is using the wonderful Ajax > > frameworks shown at WOWODC or if they are using their own stuff. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > > Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/ > > stephane.guyot11%40wanadoo.fr > > > This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/johnthuss%40gmail.com > > This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
