Hi Miguel,

On 05/02/2009, at 11:54 AM, Miguel Arroz wrote:

Hi!

On 2009/02/05, at 00:44, Ian Joyner wrote:
Modern programming languages should both be like natural language (easy to read) and have formalized grammars (BNF, denotational semantics, etc, etc). Alas most languages in use today fail on both grounds ;-)

  Natural language!?

Insofar as programs are literary works. Remember Knuth did a lot of work on what he called literate programming (ah, an ex-Burroughs associate).

  /me thinks on AppleScript... ick!

Well, NL doesn't mean verbose, in fact the opposite – laconic. I'm just against the idea of doing the opposite to NL, just for the sake of it – we might as well go back to assembler! If I ever really get to the bottom of AppleScript then I might agree or disagree with that statement, but perhaps that's exactly what you mean!

Surprisingly, I actually liked HyperTalk (and *really* loved HyperCard, I still have this crazy idea of taking the opportunity of a trip to a WWDC to visit the Bill Atkinson photo studio to meet the man in person).

Great idea, may you get your wish.

Ian _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [email protected]

Reply via email to