Am 30.03.2009 um 16:27 schrieb Mike Schrag:
That said, I'm not sure undo conceptually really works out in EOF,
anyway
You sure about that? Or is it just unreliable?
It _works_ -- that was maybe a bit too bold .. However, when you
stop using session.default, and start using lots of peers that are
very transient, I believe that ends up not really working out
practically. Doesn't each EC have its own undo manager on it, so
you would only be able to undo the transactions from a single EC and
it wouldn't be aware of its peers' transactions?
From what I understood, this was mainly for undoing changes from an
ECs POV, so deletes would get re-inserted etc. As far as this makes
sense... e.g. your didInsert() code would get called again wreaking
whatever havoc you'd expect after such a move.
Cheers, Anjo
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
