There is no 3.5 Carbon maclipse, but we have a 3.5 cocoa version.

http://idisk.mac.com/qdolan-Public/maclipse/?view=web

On 20/10/2009, at 7:25 AM, Tim Worman wrote:

I'm using 3.5 Cocoa on 10.6. While there are cases where interface elements are slower, I'm not having any problems that are keeping me from being productive. Of course, Maclipse isn't there.

T

On Oct 19, 2009, at 2:15 PM, Beatty, Daniel D CIV NAVAIR, 474300D wrote:

Greetings Mike,
Good to know. I have to say the 3.5 that I checked out this weekend worked well. It even had that MySQL reverse engineering feature working, which was cool for me.

Thanks,
Daniel Beatty
Computer Scientist, Detonation Sciences Branch
Code 474300D
2400 E. Pilot Plant Rd. M/S 1109
China Lake, CA 93555
[email protected]
(760)939-7097

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Schrag [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 14:05
To: Beatty, Daniel D CIV NAVAIR, 474300D
Cc: Andrew Lindesay; [email protected]
Subject: Re: Eclipse 3.5 - Cocoa / Carbon or Neither?

Carbon is better, but there is no 3.5 carbon Maclipse. Cocoa is definitely VERY laggy, 10.5 or 10.6. There are some very substantial performance problems. There is a new SWT guy who seems to be quite a bit more responsive to Mac SWT requests, so that bodes well.

q has been bringing forward fixes from 3.6 into maclipse, so it IS getting better.

I don't know of any particular instability issues with WOLips on 3.5.

ms

On Oct 19, 2009, at 4:48 PM, Beatty, Daniel D CIV NAVAIR, 474300D wrote:

Greetings Lindsey,
I have noticed that the Carbon version works well under 10.5.   The
Cocoa version with under 10.6 works well for me, at the moment.
Although, there are many warnings about both instability with WOLips.

Later,
Daniel Beatty
Computer Scientist, Detonation Sciences Branch Code 474300D 2400 E.
Pilot Plant Rd. M/S 1109 China Lake, CA 93555 [email protected]
(760)939-7097

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:webobjects-dev-bounces
[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andrew Lindesay
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 13:38
To: Development WebObjects
Subject: Eclipse 3.5 - Cocoa / Carbon or Neither?

Hello;

I'm setting up a new machine and if I can go Eclipse 3.5, I'd rather.
I've used the Cocoa build and it seems to get horribly slow after a
while.  Has anybody tried the Carbon build and worked with it for a
while?

cheers.

___
Andrew Lindesay
www.lindesay.co.nz

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/daniel.beatty%40
navy.mil

This email sent to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/mschrag%40mdimen
sion.com

This email sent to [email protected]


_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/lists%40thetimmy.com

This email sent to [email protected]

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/qdolan%40gmail.com

This email sent to [email protected]



--
Seeya...Q

Quinton Dolan - [email protected]
Gold Coast, QLD, Australia (GMT+10)




_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [email protected]

Reply via email to