http://issues.objectstyle.org/jira/browse/WONDER-478
On Feb 19, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Kieran Kelleher wrote: > Because ERXLongResponseTask, which I don't use, uses auto lock/unlock, just > like a request thread. > > That code is useful for plain old java task Threads that implement Callable > or Runnable and do not extend ERXLongResponseTask. It is also useful for any > other time you don't want an autolocking EC, perhaps for lazily > initialization of an EO in the database in a business logic method where > there is no guarantees that you can assume you are in a request thread with > autolocking. > > I will make a patch and see if someone with commit rights can apply it. > > Regards, Kieran > > On Feb 19, 2010, at 10:21 AM, John Huss wrote: > >> So why don't we add that code (or something similar) to >> ERXLongResponseTask.DefaultImplementation? >> >> John >> >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Kieran Kelleher <kieran_li...@mac.com> >> wrote: >> Really, just paste the few lines of code I gave u yesterday into a file and >> name it MyEOUtils.java, and then change your code below to use the static >> factory method to create the 'manual locking' ec. >> > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/kieran_lists%40mac.com > > This email sent to kieran_li...@mac.com
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
