On Mar 24, 2010, at 2:28 PM, Baiss Eric Magnusson wrote:
Well I perturbed the situation by removing 4 of the 6
WODisplayGroups, using the following kind of code (reverted back to
ERXDisplayGroup for testing), small improvement, so big picture
still is wrong.
NSMutableArray<Accounts> sortAccts = new
NSMutableArray( theOwner.toAccounts() );
return (NSArray)_Utilities._sortEOsUsingSingleKey( sortAccts,
"accountName");
public static NSMutableArray _sortEOsUsingSingleKey( NSMutableArray<?
> array, String aKey ) throws NSComparator.ComparisonException {
NSArray orderings = new
NSArray( EOSortOrdering.sortOrderingWithKey( aKey,
EOSortOrdering.CompareAscending ));
EOSortOrdering.sortArrayUsingKeyOrderArray( array,
orderings );
return array;
}
************************************************************************************
public ERXBatchingDisplayGroup<Transaction> curTrans;
curTrans.setObjectArray( theOwner.transaction() );
still throws. I look at "curTrans.queryBindings().toString() );"
before the failed call
{endMonth = 2010-04-01 00:00:00 Etc/GMT; startMonth = 2010-03-01
00:00:00 Etc/GMT; }
However ERXBatchingDisplayGroup throws:
attempt to generate SQL for
com.webobjects.eocontrol.EOKeyValueQualifier (date >= $startMonth)
failed because the qualifier variable '$startMonth' is unbound
Is there any chance that the key in the curTrans dictionary should be
named $startMonth (with the $)? I've never used these...
<date> is a <NSTimestamp> in the model.
And here's the ERXBatchingDisplayGroup <curTrans> in the debugger:
<er.extensions.batching.ERXBatchingDisplayGroup
datasource=com.webobjects.eoaccess.eodatabasedatasou...@2eb80f1c
delegate=Class: 'com.webobjects.appserver.WODisplayGroup$Delegate'
Object: <null> sortOrdering=(<class
com.webobjects.eocontrol.EOSortOrdering(date compareDescending)>)
qualifier=null localKeys=null insertedObjectDefaultValues={}
numberOfObjectsPerBatch=99>
************************************************************************************
I changed the fetch to use the objects in
theOwner.transaction()
instead of also searching for the match of the primary key "acctId"
along with the dates, isn't this a good change?
I would think so.
I will need to carry on to other pages.
Sounds like an old British movie. Carry On WebObjects
Chuck
--
Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [email protected]
