You have forward slashes instead of backslashes. Try: //VALID
On 5/18/10 4:37 AM, "webobjects-dev-requ...@lists.apple.com" <webobjects-dev-requ...@lists.apple.com> wrote: > Send Webobjects-dev mailing list submissions to > webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > webobjects-dev-requ...@lists.apple.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > webobjects-dev-ow...@lists.apple.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Webobjects-dev digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Stuck on long response page... IE (Kieran Kelleher) > 2. Re: ?? about opportunistic locking... (Kieran Kelleher) > 3. Re: ?? about opportunistic locking... (Mark Ritchie) > 4. Re: ?? about opportunistic locking... (Mike Schrag) > 5. Re: ?? about opportunistic locking... (Mark Ritchie) > 6. Re: Get rid of warning in binding value e.g. @sum.totalCost > (Cheong Hee) > 7. Re: Get rid of warning in binding value e.g. @sum.totalCost > (Cheong Hee) > 8. builds failing in Eclipse 3.6 (Tim Worman) > 9. Re: Stuck on long response page... IE (Simon) > 10. Re: builds failing in Eclipse 3.6 (Tim Worman) > 11. Re: builds failing in Eclipse 3.6 (webobje...@avendasora.com) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 22:12:53 -0400 > From: Kieran Kelleher <kieran_li...@mac.com> > Subject: Re: Stuck on long response page... IE > To: Simon <si...@potwells.co.uk> > Cc: WebObjects Development <webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com> > Message-ID: <f1ffb5b7-10f8-4d09-813c-4058807e2...@mac.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Instead of a traditional "LongResponse" page try using a > "GenericAjaxLongResponsePage" page that has an AjaxProgress component on it to > monitor the task and a 'finishedFunction' binding on that to execute the > nextPage action when task is done. That's MOL what I do nowadays. > > HTH, Kieran > > > On May 17, 2010, at 7:57 AM, Simon wrote: > >> hi all - >> >> our apps use long response pages all over the shop, and we've had a few >> reports of users getting stuck on them. after mucho debugging we've >> discovered that wonderful IE (7+) has an option to disable meta refresh, and >> various reports on the intertubes that it's disabled by default in various >> versions. >> >> i normally get annoyed with IE browsers wanting to warn about every minor >> glitch on a page ("HEY, just in case you're interested there is a js variable >> undefined on this page that you're never gonna use, but i thought i'd tell >> you about it anyway, just to get in the way and make your life a little less >> productive. ok?"), but with this one IE does just the opposite: nothing at >> all. you hit the long response page and sit there... >> >> anyway, i've been googling around for solutions and turned up nothing. i >> guess the options are either to detect they have it turned off (which appears >> to be impossible), or use another form of refresh. >> >> anyone bumped into this one before ? any hints on solutions ? >> >> thanks, simon >> _______________________________________________ >> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >> Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) >> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/kieran_lists%40mac.com >> >> This email sent to kieran_li...@mac.com > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 22:21:42 -0400 > From: Kieran Kelleher <kieran_li...@mac.com> > Subject: Re: ?? about opportunistic locking... > To: Miguel Arroz <ar...@guiamac.com> > Cc: webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com, Theodore Petrosky > <tedp...@yahoo.com> > Message-ID: <c30e7d08-d5fe-41c9-b426-276e02333...@mac.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Miguel, I am with you on this one ....... unless someone shows me a better > approach....... > > For stuff that I *depend* on optimistic locking to support my business logic, > I wrap transactions in a *brief* osc.lock() ........ it works ..... and for > saving brain cycles I use this utility class to wrap optimistic lock > transactions: > > <snip> > /** > * Deals with the nitty-gritty of a critical <strong>short-running</strong> > * task where we depend on optimistic locking to guarantee that another > * process does not change optimistic locking attributes at the same time. To > * understand why this is necessary, read this: > * {...@link http://terminalapp.net/dr-optimistic-locking/}. > * > * Wraps the actions in > * appropriate locks. WARNING: The OSC is locked for the period of the > * transaction. All EOF access on this OSC is blocked. Do not use this for > * actions that take more than a few milliseconds on OSC's that are being > * used by request threads! > * > * Code design inspired by {...@link ERXEOAccessUtilities.ChannelAction} > * > * Example of usage > * > * <pre> > * OptimisticLockAction action = new WKEOUtils.OptimisticLockAction() { > * @Override > * protected Object doPerform(EOEditingContext actionEditingContext) { > * CTCampaign localCampaign = (CTCampaign) > actionEditingContext.faultForGlobalID(gid, actionEditingContext); > * try { > * // Ship it > * localCampaign.shipMessages(); > * actionEditingContext.saveChanges(); > * } catch (EOGeneralAdaptorException e) { > * String additionalInfo = WKEOUtils.generalAdaptorExceptionInfo(e); > * log.error("Failed to ship campaign " + localCampaign + ". > Probably another instance was sending " > * + "this campaign to the production mail queueat the same time; > AdditionalInfo: " > * + additionalInfo, e); > * } > * return null; > * } > * }; > * > * try { > * action.perform(parentObjectStore()); > * } catch (Exception e) { > * throw new RuntimeException(e); > * } > * </pre> > * > * @author kieran > */ > public static abstract class OptimisticLockAction { > > /** > * This method is called in a new locked editing context that has been > * created in the osc passed in. Perform your changes in this editing > * context. Any errors will be thrown. Return any result you want. > * > * @param osc > */ > protected abstract Object doPerform(EOEditingContext ec); > > public Object perform() throws Exception { > return perform(null); > } > > /** > * @param osc > * the root object store to be locked so that true optimistic > * locking can be enforced. > * @return the result of your doPerform method implementation > * @throws Exception > */ > public Object perform(EOObjectStore osc) throws Exception { > osc.lock(); > try { > EOEditingContext ec = WKEOUtils.newManualLockingEditingContext(osc); > ec.lock(); > try { > // Don't use stale EO's to begin with > ec.setFetchTimestamp(System.currentTimeMillis()); > return doPerform(ec); > } catch (Exception e) { > throw e; > } finally { > ec.unlock(); > ec.dispose(); > } > } catch (Exception e) { > throw e; > } finally { > osc.unlock(); > } > } > } > > </snip> > > > > > > > > > > > On May 17, 2010, at 5:33 PM, Miguel Arroz wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> It's optimistic locking, and in my opinion, it's not implemented correctly >> in WO! ;) >> >> http://terminalapp.net/dr-optimistic-locking/ >> >> Have fun. >> >> (I'm not sure if that blog post is 100% correct, I wrote it 2 years ago, but >> it should be enough to explain the problem) >> >> Yours >> >> Miguel Arroz >> >> On 2010/05/17, at 22:18, Theodore Petrosky wrote: >> >>> I have a small app where I create a modaldialog to edit the attributes of an >>> entity. all of the attributes are marked for 'locking' in Entity Modeler. >>> >>> I ran my app in development mode and brought up the dialog to edit the >>> attributes. >>> >>> I fired up another computer pointed the browser at the same record. >>> >>> so both computers are looking at record 1 and have different values in the >>> fields. >>> >>> I was expecting that that I could saved the changes from the browser on >>> machine one, and if I tried to save the changes from machine two the app >>> would throw an exception and I would see it in the logs.... >>> >>> to my surprise, there was no error... machine two's changes were saved over >>> machine one. >>> >>> so either I am doing something wrong or I don't understand opportunistic >>> locking.. >>> >>> I hope someone can help straighten me out. >>> >>> Ted >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) >>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >>> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/arroz%40guiamac.com >>> >>> This email sent to ar...@guiamac.com >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >> Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) >> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/kieran_lists%40mac.com >> >> This email sent to kieran_li...@mac.com > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 19:33:23 -0700 > From: Mark Ritchie <mark.ritc...@mac.com> > Subject: Re: ?? about opportunistic locking... > To: Mike Schrag <msch...@pobox.com> > Cc: WebObjects-Dev Mailing List List <webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com> > Message-ID: <600f0ecc-b23a-466b-8119-482866bbf...@mac.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hey Mike! > > On 17/May/2010, at 4:24 PM, Mike Schrag wrote: >> so here's your challenge ... make this fail with an optimistic lock exception >> when EC2 saves (which is what would happen if EC1 was in another instance): > > But that's the point... When an EO in your application changes, you are > notified via the delegate! You don't have to wait until you try to > saveChanges and get the exception. I agree with what others have posted > recently on this topic, getting notified of a collision at the earliest point > is much preferred! > > As to the rest of it, I think that you're making it way too complicated... > My delegate works just fine at caching the changes and applying them later: > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: MarksDelegate.java > Type: application/octet-stream > Size: 2445 bytes > Desc: not available > Url : > http://lists.apple.com/pipermail/webobjects-dev/attachments/20100517/b647f807/ > MarksDelegate.obj > -------------- next part -------------- > > > This is what I've used in the past (since ObjC days) and I don't know of a > case where it fails. > M. > > P.S. My run log looks like this (after the 100 objects are created): > > > May 17 19:28:06 UseTheDelegate[49584] DEBUG NSLog - evaluateExpression: > <com.webobjects.jdbcadaptor.MySQLPlugIn$MySQLExpression: "SELECT t0.id, > RTRIM(t0.name) FROM Company t0" withBindings: > > May 17 19:28:06 UseTheDelegate[49584] DEBUG NSLog - 100 row(s) processed > May 17 19:28:06 UseTheDelegate[49584] DEBUG NSLog - === Commit Internal > Transaction > Application.Application: ec0 = er.extensions.eof.er...@7fd88db7 > Application.Application: ec1 = er.extensions.eof.er...@524c71d2 > Application.Application: ec2 = er.extensions.eof.er...@49198ff2 > Application.Application: Company 98 > Application.Application: Company 98 > Application.Application: Company 98 > > C1 updated, not saved. > Application.Application: Company 98 > Application.Application: C1 1274149686265 > Application.Application: Company 98 > > C2 updated, not saved. > Application.Application: Company 98 > Application.Application: C1 1274149686265 > Application.Application: C2 1274149686265 > > May 17 19:28:06 UseTheDelegate[49584] DEBUG NSLog - === Begin Internal > Transaction > May 17 19:28:06 UseTheDelegate[49584] DEBUG NSLog - evaluateExpression: > <com.webobjects.jdbcadaptor.MySQLPlugIn$MySQLExpression: "UPDATE Company SET > name = ? WHERE (id = ? AND name = ?)" withBindings: 1:"C1 > 1274149686265"(name), 2:89(id), 3:"Company 98"(name)> > May 17 19:28:06 UseTheDelegate[49584] DEBUG NSLog - === Commit Internal > Transaction > MarksDelegate.editingContext: er.extensions.eof.er...@49198ff2 > shouldMergeChangesForObject: eo = <your.app.eo.Company 2d397e5c > _EOIntegralKeyGlobalID[Company (java.lang.Integer)89]> > MarksDelegate.editingContext: er.extensions.eof.er...@49198ff2 > didMergeChanges: > MarksDelegate.editingContext: er.extensions.eof.er...@7fd88db7 > shouldInvalidateObject: eo = <your.app.eo.Company 51701bdc > _EOIntegralKeyGlobalID[Company (java.lang.Integer)89]> > MarksDelegate.editingContext: er.extensions.eof.er...@7fd88db7 > didMergeChanges: > MarksDelegate.editingContext: er.extensions.eof.er...@524c71d2 > shouldInvalidateObject: eo = <your.app.eo.Company 1c2006a0 > _EOIntegralKeyGlobalID[Company (java.lang.Integer)89]> > MarksDelegate.editingContext: er.extensions.eof.er...@524c71d2 > didMergeChanges: > C1 saved. > Application.Application: C1 1274149686265 > Application.Application: C1 1274149686265 > Application.Application: C2 1274149686265 > > May 17 19:28:06 UseTheDelegate[49584] DEBUG NSLog - === Begin Internal > Transaction > May 17 19:28:06 UseTheDelegate[49584] DEBUG NSLog - evaluateExpression: > <com.webobjects.jdbcadaptor.MySQLPlugIn$MySQLExpression: "UPDATE Company SET > name = ? WHERE (id = ? AND name = ?)" withBindings: 1:"C2 > 1274149686265"(name), 2:89(id), 3:"C1 1274149686265"(name)> > May 17 19:28:06 UseTheDelegate[49584] DEBUG NSLog - === Commit Internal > Transaction > MarksDelegate.editingContext: er.extensions.eof.er...@524c71d2 > shouldInvalidateObject: eo = <your.app.eo.Company 1c2006a0 > _EOIntegralKeyGlobalID[Company (java.lang.Integer)89]> > MarksDelegate.editingContext: er.extensions.eof.er...@524c71d2 > didMergeChanges: > MarksDelegate.editingContext: er.extensions.eof.er...@7fd88db7 > shouldInvalidateObject: eo = <your.app.eo.Company 51701bdc > _EOIntegralKeyGlobalID[Company (java.lang.Integer)89]> > MarksDelegate.editingContext: er.extensions.eof.er...@7fd88db7 > didMergeChanges: > MarksDelegate.editingContext: er.extensions.eof.er...@49198ff2 > shouldInvalidateObject: eo = <your.app.eo.Company 2d397e5c > _EOIntegralKeyGlobalID[Company (java.lang.Integer)89]> > MarksDelegate.editingContext: er.extensions.eof.er...@49198ff2 > didMergeChanges: > May 17 19:28:06 UseTheDelegate[49584] DEBUG NSLog - === Begin Internal > Transaction > May 17 19:28:06 UseTheDelegate[49584] DEBUG NSLog - evaluateExpression: > <com.webobjects.jdbcadaptor.MySQLPlugIn$MySQLExpression: "SELECT t0.id, > RTRIM(t0.name) FROM Company t0 WHERE t0.id = ?" withBindings: 1:89(id)> > May 17 19:28:06 UseTheDelegate[49584] DEBUG NSLog - 1 row(s) processed > May 17 19:28:06 UseTheDelegate[49584] DEBUG NSLog - === Commit Internal > Transaction > C2 saved. > Application.Application: C2 1274149686265 > Application.Application: C2 1274149686265 > Application.Application: C2 1274149686265 > May 17 19:28:06 UseTheDelegate[49584] DEBUG NSLog - The URL for webserver > connect is: > http://17.246.48.60/cgi-bin/WebObjects/UseTheDelegate.woa/-49584 > The URL for direct connect is: > http://17.246.48.60:49584/cgi-bin/WebObjects/UseTheDelegate.woa > May 17 19:28:06 UseTheDelegate[49584] WARN NSLog - > May 17 19:28:06 UseTheDelegate[49584] WARN > er.extensions.appserver.ERXApplication - You are running in development mode > with WOAutoOpenInBrowser = false. No browser will open and it will look like > the application is hung, but it's not. There's just not a browser opening > automatically. > May 17 19:28:06 UseTheDelegate[49584] DEBUG NSLog - Waiting for requests... > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 23:26:33 -0400 > From: Mike Schrag <msch...@pobox.com> > Subject: Re: ?? about opportunistic locking... > To: Mark Ritchie <mark.ritc...@mac.com> > Cc: WebObjects-Dev Mailing List List <webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com> > Message-ID: <01f6413b-fb70-4073-95a8-ed8b592b4...@pobox.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > >> On 17/May/2010, at 4:24 PM, Mike Schrag wrote: >>> so here's your challenge ... make this fail with an optimistic lock >>> exception when EC2 saves (which is what would happen if EC1 was in another >>> instance): >> But that's the point... When an EO in your application changes, you are >> notified via the delegate! You don't have to wait until you try to >> saveChanges and get the exception. I agree with what others have posted >> recently on this topic, getting notified of a collision at the earliest point >> is much preferred! > Well, sure you agree with them. And they're wrong too ;) > > The problem is that this implementation is horribly confusing. As soon as you > go to multiple instances (which everyone will do), your apps now behave > completely inconsistently. I find this to be bad design. Now your app is > handling optimistic locking failures in TWO places -- once weirdly in this > delegate, which can't easily propagate up to a UI and the other that happens > in your catch block for saveChanges, which DOES propagate to the UI. As far as > I can tell, this API seems to be one that must have come from the desktop > version of EOF where you're always in-process to your changes. Those API's are > all dead to me. > >> This is what I've used in the past (since ObjC days) and I don't know of a >> case where it fails. > This depends on your definition of "fail." I agree that for the way you're > using it it works. For the ACTUAL complaint I have, it seems insufficient. I'm > also not sure you even run in the right thread to throw that exception. This > responds to ObjectsChangedInStore, which probably means it runs in EC1's > thread? Or does it queue up and run in EC2's thread when in > performRecentChanges or something? Regardless, I suspect to make > inter-instance and intra-instance behavior match, you're going to have to do a > lot more work ... hence my gripe. > > If you can get an optimistic lock on ec2.saveChanges out of this technique, > I'll be a fan of it (because then we can just wire this into Wonder on all > EC's and have this problem fixed or at least an opt-in feature), but I'm still > not convinced yet. > > ms > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 21:05:05 -0700 > From: Mark Ritchie <mark.ritc...@mac.com> > Subject: Re: ?? about opportunistic locking... > To: Mike Schrag <msch...@pobox.com> > Cc: WebObjects-Dev Mailing List List <webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com> > Message-ID: <b14cf86a-b4b7-4cc9-a0d9-c71eae244...@mac.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Hey! > > On 17/May/2010, at 8:26 PM, Mike Schrag wrote: >> Well, sure you agree with them. And they're wrong too ;) > LOL Ok, now it's time to break out the Nerf equipment! ;-) > >> As far as I can tell, this API seems to be one that must have come from the >> desktop version of EOF where you're always in-process to your changes. Those >> API's are all dead to me. > Yes, of course this design is from 'real' EOF! ObjC EOF and AppKit on > NeXTSTEP/OPENSTEP! ;-) > Dead or not, it's the history which forms what we have today. > >>> This is what I've used in the past (since ObjC days) and I don't know of a >>> case where it fails. >> This depends on your definition of "fail." I agree that for the way you're >> using it it works. For the ACTUAL complaint I have, it seems insufficient. >> I'm also not sure you even run in the right thread to throw that exception. >> This responds to ObjectsChangedInStore, which probably means it runs in EC1's >> thread? Or does it queue up and run in EC2's thread when in >> performRecentChanges or something? Regardless, I suspect to make >> inter-instance and intra-instance behavior match, you're going to have to do >> a lot more work ... hence my gripe. > Those two cases need to be different! If anything, the inter-instance case is > broken in that it doesn't properly notify EC's in other running instances that > objects they are interested in have become invalid! However, until we have > EC's properly hooked into the psychic-friends network, I don't see how that's > going to happen. > >> If you can get an optimistic lock on ec2.saveChanges out of this technique, >> I'll be a fan of it (because then we can just wire this into Wonder on all >> EC's and have this problem fixed or at least an opt-in feature), but I'm >> still not convinced yet. > But that's just it, I don't want to have ec2.saveChanges() fail. By the time > that ec2 is back to running, it's EO's have been updated and it's good to > save! The delegate gives the application developer the control to handle this > case in way specific to their application implementation. Something that I > could not divine a general solution too! > > And yes, by the by, I'm pretty sure that you're correct that when the delegate > is called, it's within the thread of the EC which posted the notification and > thus throwing any exception would never make it to the handler of another EC. > Nor should it! ;-) > > Now, having said all that, I would be open to the idea of making this easier > to understand for new developers however that must not come at the cost of > sacrificing the notification that objects have changed from what you thought > they were. M. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 12:11:44 +0800 > From: "Cheong Hee" <chn...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: Get rid of warning in binding value e.g. @sum.totalCost > To: "Kieran Kelleher" <kieran_li...@mac.com> > Cc: Development WebObjects <webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com> > Message-ID: <003b01caf640$3eee87c0$6501a...@chngmacxp> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; > reply-type=original > > Not sure if I got it right. I appended \\VALID to the binding value, the > red icon now complains: > - '\' is an unknown keyword > - Unable to verify operator 'sum.numberOfHour' > - 'VALID' is an unknown keyword > - '\' is an unknown keyword > > Just to be sure, this is the string binding used: > String11: WOString { > numberformat = "0.00"; > value = selectedresource.trainin...@sum.numberofhour;\\VALID > } > > Cheers > > Cheong Hee > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kieran Kelleher" <kieran_li...@mac.com> > To: "Cheong Hee Ng" <chn...@gmail.com> > Cc: "Development WebObjects" <webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com> > Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 6:26 PM > Subject: Re: Get rid of warning in binding value e.g. @sum.totalCost > > >> selectedresource.trainin...@sum.totalcost;\\VALID >> >> >> On May 17, 2010, at 5:51 AM, Cheong Hee Ng wrote: >> >>> selectedresource.trainin...@sum.totalcost; >> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 13:14:49 +0800 > From: "Cheong Hee" <chn...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: Get rid of warning in binding value e.g. @sum.totalCost > To: "Kieran Kelleher" <kieran_li...@mac.com> > Cc: Development WebObjects <webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com> > Message-ID: <005d01caf649$3cd10fe0$6501a...@chngmacxp> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; > reply-type=response > > > Not sure why this happened - the second time i did the changes with same > same sequence, saved... the error disappeared. > > Pls ignore previous email. Thanks, Kieran. > > another note, any pointer as where to get more info about stuff like > //VALID. > > Cheers > > Cheong Hee > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Cheong Hee" <chn...@gmail.com> > To: "Kieran Kelleher" <kieran_li...@mac.com> > Cc: "Development WebObjects" <webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com> > Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 12:11 PM > Subject: Re: Get rid of warning in binding value e.g. @sum.totalCost > > >> Not sure if I got it right. I appended \\VALID to the binding value, the >> red icon now complains: >> - '\' is an unknown keyword >> - Unable to verify operator 'sum.numberOfHour' >> - 'VALID' is an unknown keyword >> - '\' is an unknown keyword >> >> Just to be sure, this is the string binding used: >> String11: WOString { >> numberformat = "0.00"; >> value = selectedresource.trainin...@sum.numberofhour;\\VALID >> } >> >> Cheers >> >> Cheong Hee >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Kieran Kelleher" <kieran_li...@mac.com> >> To: "Cheong Hee Ng" <chn...@gmail.com> >> Cc: "Development WebObjects" <webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com> >> Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 6:26 PM >> Subject: Re: Get rid of warning in binding value e.g. @sum.totalCost >> >> >>> selectedresource.trainin...@sum.totalcost;\\VALID >>> >>> >>> On May 17, 2010, at 5:51 AM, Cheong Hee Ng wrote: >>> >>>> selectedresource.trainin...@sum.totalcost; >>> >> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 23:00:24 -0700 > From: Tim Worman <li...@thetimmy.com> > Subject: builds failing in Eclipse 3.6 > To: WebObjects Development <webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com> > Message-ID: <a913ad8d-8661-43ea-91a4-899bb4773...@thetimmy.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > All: > > I could use some tips about how to troubleshoot ant build problems. I'm sure > this has to do with the fact that I've updated to Eclipse 3.6. I'm running the > cocoa 64-bit version. I haven't been able to build any apps this evening. > > I'm using the conventional method: > > right-click on build.xml > Run As > Ant Build > > I've never run into build problems failures like this so I've never had to > look into something like this. I switched back to Eclipse 3.5 to build my > apps. > > Tim Worman > UCLA GSE&IS > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 07:53:54 +0100 > From: Simon <si...@potwells.co.uk> > Subject: Re: Stuck on long response page... IE > To: Kieran Kelleher <kieran_li...@mac.com> > Cc: WebObjects Development <webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com> > Message-ID: > <aanlktilombs-ubrlfwmc7fymbabcuixqaroakfgtp...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > is the ajax variety pretty much a drop in replacement for the old hat one ? > what about locking issues ? ERXWOLongResponsePage does some funky stuff > around ec locking - i guess with the ajax variety you're on your own ? > > simon > > On 18 May 2010 03:12, Kieran Kelleher <kieran_li...@mac.com> wrote: > >> Instead of a traditional "LongResponse" page try using a >> "GenericAjaxLongResponsePage" page that has an AjaxProgress component on it >> to monitor the task and a 'finishedFunction' binding on that to execute the >> nextPage action when task is done. That's MOL what I do nowadays. >> >> HTH, Kieran >> >> >> On May 17, 2010, at 7:57 AM, Simon wrote: >> >>> hi all - >>> >>> our apps use long response pages all over the shop, and we've had a few >> reports of users getting stuck on them. after mucho debugging we've >> discovered that wonderful IE (7+) has an option to disable meta refresh, and >> various reports on the intertubes that it's disabled by default in various >> versions. >>> >>> i normally get annoyed with IE browsers wanting to warn about every minor >> glitch on a page ("HEY, just in case you're interested there is a js >> variable undefined on this page that you're never gonna use, but i thought >> i'd tell you about it anyway, just to get in the way and make your life a >> little less productive. ok?"), but with this one IE does just the opposite: >> nothing at all. you hit the long response page and sit there... >>> >>> anyway, i've been googling around for solutions and turned up nothing. i >> guess the options are either to detect they have it turned off (which >> appears to be impossible), or use another form of refresh. >>> >>> anyone bumped into this one before ? any hints on solutions ? >>> >>> thanks, simon >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) >>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >>> >> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/kieran_lists%40mac.com >>> >>> This email sent to kieran_li...@mac.com >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://lists.apple.com/pipermail/webobjects-dev/attachments/20100518/087447d2/ > attachment.html > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 01:10:30 -0700 > From: Tim Worman <li...@thetimmy.com> > Subject: Re: builds failing in Eclipse 3.6 > To: Mike Schrag <msch...@gmail.com> > Cc: WebObjects Development <webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com> > Message-ID: <071e9d1f-f130-4bb6-8334-e35bbd447...@thetimmy.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > I wasn't trying to be vague. I'm honestly not seeing much of anything in > Eclipse. It starts to run, then says terminated almost immediately. There is > nothing in the console. I'm sure it's something I should be able to solve > which is why I tried to focus my question on how I can troubleshoot better. > :-) > > > Tim Worman > UCLA GSE&IS > > > > On May 18, 2010, at 12:58 AM, Mike Schrag wrote: > >> "build errors" >> Read: "I had a problem but I'm going to keep the details secret. Mu ha ha" >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On May 18, 2010, at 2:00 AM, Tim Worman <li...@thetimmy.com> wrote: >> >>> All: >>> >>> I could use some tips about how to troubleshoot ant build problems. I'm sure >>> this has to do with the fact that I've updated to Eclipse 3.6. I'm running >>> the cocoa 64-bit version. I haven't been able to build any apps this >>> evening. >>> >>> I'm using the conventional method: >>> >>> right-click on build.xml > Run As > Ant Build >>> >>> I've never run into build problems failures like this so I've never had to >>> look into something like this. I switched back to Eclipse 3.5 to build my >>> apps. >>> >>> Tim Worman >>> UCLA GSE&IS >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) >>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >>> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/mschrag%40pobox.com >>> >>> This email sent to msch...@pobox.com > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 11 > Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 04:37:02 -0600 (MDT) > From: webobje...@avendasora.com > Subject: Re: builds failing in Eclipse 3.6 > To: "Tim Worman" <li...@thetimmy.com> > Cc: WebObjects Development <webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com>, Mike > Schrag <msch...@gmail.com> > Message-ID: > <46474.173.73.102.187.1274179022.squir...@webmail.modwest.com> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 > > Hi Tim, > > I don't see this behavior with 3.6. > > When I do the same on a project I've never built this way before (I use > Hudson - it's just too awesome) it does fail, but with error messages in > the console saying it can't find ERExtensions because I don't have the > compiled Wonder frameworks anywhere (see: I use Hudson). > > 1) Is the build.xml file a stock one or do you have modifications? > 2) Can you paste the contents of your build.properties file here? > 3) What are the contents of the Eclipse Menu -> Preferences -> WOLips -> > Build -> WOLips Properties File setting? > 4) If #3 isn't blank, what are the contents of that file? > > Dave > >> I wasn't trying to be vague. I'm honestly not seeing much of anything in >> Eclipse. It starts to run, then says terminated almost immediately. There >> is nothing in the console. I'm sure it's something I should be able to >> solve which is why I tried to focus my question on how I can troubleshoot >> better. :-) >> >> >> Tim Worman >> UCLA GSE&IS >> >> >> >> On May 18, 2010, at 12:58 AM, Mike Schrag wrote: >> >>> "build errors" >>> Read: "I had a problem but I'm going to keep the details secret. Mu ha >>> ha" >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On May 18, 2010, at 2:00 AM, Tim Worman <li...@thetimmy.com> wrote: >>> >>>> All: >>>> >>>> I could use some tips about how to troubleshoot ant build problems. I'm >>>> sure this has to do with the fact that I've updated to Eclipse 3.6. I'm >>>> running the cocoa 64-bit version. I haven't been able to build any apps >>>> this evening. >>>> >>>> I'm using the conventional method: >>>> >>>> right-click on build.xml > Run As > Ant Build >>>> >>>> I've never run into build problems failures like this so I've never had >>>> to look into something like this. I switched back to Eclipse 3.5 to >>>> build my apps. >>>> >>>> Tim Worman >>>> UCLA GSE&IS >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) >>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >>>> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/mschrag%40pobox.com >>>> >>>> This email sent to msch...@pobox.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >> Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) >> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/webobjects%40avendasora >> .com >> >> This email sent to webobje...@avendasora.com >> >> >> > > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Webobjects-dev mailing list > Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev > > End of Webobjects-dev Digest, Vol 7, Issue 304 > ********************************************** _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
