It is a good to have a way to let user has the control over the validation. In my case, the binding is "usually" correct since it was system generated code using WOBuilder to transverse through object relationships. The Component Builder can't pass through anything after e.g @sum, @avg. Is it a limitation or a feature could be improved? I found that this often very practical and convenient. The hint on the warnings and errors are great that our beloved old tool can't give.

----- Original Message ----- From: <webobje...@avendasora.com>
To: "Cheong Hee" <chn...@gmail.com>
Cc: "Kieran Kelleher" <kieran_li...@mac.com>; <webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com>; "Dawn Lockhart" <dlockh...@k12.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 8:35 PM
Subject: Re: Get rid of warning in binding value e.g. @sum.totalCost


It's just a hint for the component binding validator to tell it that even
though it can't validate that binding, that you _know_ it's correct.

As far as other hints, I'm really hoping for the eventual implementation
of //DoWhatIWantNotWhatICoded hint that will resolve 90% of my bugs.

Dave

I browse through the preferences and thought i understand some and some
need to try it out...  One i still could not figure out is where on earth
is the magic word "//VALID" comes from :)  Next level of curiosity is -
are there any more.  Thanks for d pointers.

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Kieran Kelleher
  To: Cheong Hee Ng
  Cc: Dawn Lockhart ; webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com
  Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 1:04 AM
  Subject: Re: Get rid of warning in binding value e.g. @sum.totalCost


By the way, u probably know already, but you can edit wolips preferences
to get rid of some/many of the warnings ....




  On May 19, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Cheong Hee Ng wrote:


    No worry, appreciate the info otherwise will still need to live with
warning signs.  Good day!



    On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Kieran Kelleher
<kieran_li...@mac.com> wrote:

      Cheong,

      Yeah, sorry  -typo - I should have said    //VALID

      -Kieran


      On May 19, 2010, at 1:15 AM, Cheong Hee wrote:

      > Make sense, thanks.  Probably the first trial was using the
backslashes. Sometimes I thought forward slashes and back slashes
are really a joke to the users.  At one time it is
interchangeable, whilst at other moment it is forbidden.  <grumble
/>
      >
      > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dawn Lockhart"
<dlockh...@k12.com>
      > To: <chn...@gmail.com>
      > Cc: <webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com>
      > Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 9:19 PM
      > Subject: Re: Webobjects-dev Digest, Vol 7, Issue 304
      >
      >
      >> You have forward slashes instead of backslashes. Try:
      >>
      >> //VALID
      >>
      >

      > _______________________________________________
      > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
      > Webobjects-dev mailing list      (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
      > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/kieran_lists%40mac.com
      >
      > This email sent to kieran_li...@mac.com





 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/webobjects%40avendasora.com

This email sent to webobje...@avendasora.com



_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to